Can Science and Religion Coexist?

TODAY'S NEW YORK TIMES reported that President Obama has nominated Francis Collins to be the next director of the National Institutes of Health. It caught my eye not only because this is a remarkably important position but also because of this passage:

[One of the objections some have made about the selection of Collins] is his very public embrace of religion. He wrote a book called “The Language of God,” and he has given many talks and interviews in which he described his conversion to Christianity as a 27-year-old medical student. Religion and genetic research have long had a fraught relationship, and some in the field complain about what they see as Dr. Collins’s evangelism.

Strange. The Times article offers no other evidence supporting this objection, nor does it quote anyone explaining it further. And in an admittedly cursory search on the Internet to find out just what about Collins' "embrace of religion" is raising eyebrows, I didn't see anything arguing against Collins on these grounds. But, even so, what are his critics basing this objection on?

While I did not read "The Language of God" I heard and read interviews with Collins around the time of its publication. I was pretty impressed by how he carefully and passionately argued that science and religion are not mutually exclusive pursuits. My reaction to everything Collins said was "good for him" or 'how thoughtful." Steven Waldman, editor of the online religion magazine, Beliefnet, offers an apt quote from Collins:

Suppose God chose to use the mechanism of evolution to create animals like us, knowing this process would lead to big-brained creatures with the capacity to think, ask questions about our own origins, discover the truth about the universe and discover pointers toward the One who provides meaning to life. Who are we to say that's not how we would have done it? If you believe that God is the creator, how could the truths about nature we discover through science be a threat to God? For many scientists who believe in God -- including me -- it's just the opposite. Everything we learn about the natural world only increases our awe of the God the creator....

I have to think a bit longer about whether I agree or disagree with that theology, if that's what it is. But I don't see where comments like these are hostile to science or compromise Collins' capacity to administer the world's largest scientific research funding institution. I don't care where his values came from or what shaped them -- whether they were religious or secular sources. I care that he has well-considered values. Indeed, his pronouncements have suggested some sophisticated thinking about the interplay of science and religion. And his experience running the Human Genome Project, as well as other scientific achievements, suggest he's more than capable -- though I'll leave it up to the experts to judge him on that score.

I personally know of scientists -- accomplished and rigorously objective -- who are also religiously observant, and there are plenty of other examples of such people living among us today and long gone. Who says a scientist can't be religious or a religious person can't be a scientist? And why not? 

Jeff

Comments

[Term papers]

No i dont think so that Science and Religion Coexist? dont know about the others opinion anyways nice post..!